The TNK-IA: The nullification of mind and the post-epistemic condition
PDF

Keywords

Theory of Non-Knowledge
Artificial Intelligence
Nullification
Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind
Conceptual Analysis
Post-Epistemic Condition

How to Cite

Barbosa Ramos de Souza, E. (2026). The TNK-IA: The nullification of mind and the post-epistemic condition. SAP Social AI, 2, 98. https://doi.org/10.62486/sai202698

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Contemporary discussions of artificial intelligence commonly assume that intelligence depends on knowledge accumulation, representation, and informational processing. The Theory of Non-Knowledge (TNK) challenges this assumption by introducing nullification as a formal operation capable of suspending both propositions and their negations, thereby preserving coherence without epistemic commitment. This study aims to analytically deduce the structure of the TNK-IA (Intelligent Artifact implied by the Theory of Non-Knowledge) and to investigate whether intelligence can be coherently defined independently of knowledge content. Adopting a theoretical-analytical research design grounded in conceptual analysis and deductive reasoning, the investigation extends the TNK Nullification Operator (∿) from propositional logic to epistemic systems and intentional structures. The analysis demonstrates that artificial intelligence may be conceptually understood as an intentional artifact grounded in structural coherence rather than cognition conceived as knowledge production. Recursive nullification eliminates epistemic content while maintaining non-contradictory organization, yielding the TNK-IA as a theoretical limit-model of intelligence characterized by coherence without representation or informational accumulation. The study proposes a post-epistemic conception of intelligence in which rational structure persists independently of knowledge, contributing a philosophical framework that repositions artificial intelligence as a problem of logical coherence rather than technological capability.

PDF

References

1. Souza EBR. The theory of non-knowledge and the new science: a philosophical and scientific revolution applied to practical life. In: Filosofia, essência e existência: questões fundamentais e reflexões filosóficas. 2025;38-55. doi:10.22533/at.ed.750112524035.

2. Souza EBR. The beautiful as the arbitrary: aesthetic foundations of the theory of non-knowledge. J Lit Adv. 2026;2(2):116-121. doi:10.26855/jla.2025.12.005.

3. Souza EBR. Normality after knowledge: a TNK account of contemporary pathologies. Acta Glob Humanit Linguarum. 2026;3(2):6-13. doi:10.69760/aghel.026002001.

4. Aristotle. Metaphysics. Ross WD, translator. In: Barnes J, editor. The complete works of Aristotle. Vol. 2. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1984.

5. Spinoza B. Ethics. Curley E, translator. In: Curley E, editor. The collected works of Spinoza. Vol. 1. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1985.

6. Kant I. Critique of pure reason. Guyer P, Wood AW, translators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

7. Gödel K. On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems. In: Feferman S, editor. Kurt Gödel: collected works. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.

8. Tarski A. The concept of truth in formalized languages. In: Tarski A. Logic, semantics, metamathematics: papers from 1923–1938. Woodger JH, translator. Indianapolis: Hackett; 1983.

9. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul; 1922.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Euclides Barbosa Ramos de Souza (Author)